Science of Triathlon

Garret Rock on his Fezzari T5

Heart Rate Training: The Importance of Base Building

2

Heart rate training has gone through its ups and downs throughout the years. To some it is considered a fad, much like fads such as low-carb diets. To others it’s considered the most effective training method still. In my reviews of literature, I fall somewhere in between, however, I sway more toward the side of heart rate training being one of the most effective means by which to train (with important considerations…so make sure you read the entire article).

How Long

The majority of people that monitor their heart rates during workouts really don’t have much of a clue about why they are doing this or what their goal is in doing it. The goal of heart rate training should be to build a base fitness level that is enough to take you through your goal event feeling strong. To adequately build this base, science generally says it will take 4-6 months of heart rate training to build a base, depending on the distance/amount of time the event will take.  Fezzari Bicycles sells many different heart rate monitors and cycling computers.  Give them a call and they can help you find the one best for your training needs.

How Do You Determine Your Optimal Heart Rate In Training?

The ideal heart rate to train at is debated a bit, however most equations result in numbers that are similar. The equation for determining your ideal training heart rate I like best (because of the research behind it) is the one developed by Dr. Phil Maffetone. His equation is 180 minus your age. If you have had injuries caused by training (knee pain, ITB syndrome, etc), or have been sick in the last 3 months you should subtract 5. If you have been training consistently for at least 6 months without any sickness or injuries, you can add 5. If you have a chronic health problem, such as heart disease or diabetes, subtract 10.

Dr. Phil Maffetone’s Heart Rate Training Calculation Example

As an example of calculating an ideal base building heart rate, we will use a 32 year old that has only been consistently training for 2 months, so we will not add or subtract anything. Their ideal heart rate would be 148.

Value  Age Example  Ideal Training Rate
Base 180  - 32  148 bpm
Base – Injury 180  - (32 – 5)  153 bpm
Base + Healthy 180  - (32 + 5)  143 bpm

In setting a plan for base building, you first must consider your race distance. If your goal is an Ironman 70.3, most evidence says you will need at least 4 months of base building at your ideal heart rate. If it is a full Ironman (140.6), at least 6 months of base building is necessary.

While base building, all of your training is done at your ideal heart rate. Speed work, intervals, progressions, and such are thrown away. For most triathletes, this concept is VERY hard to do because we have it engrained in us that we will lose speed if we don’t do speed work. I ensure you, this is not true at all, and in fact the research, both anecdotal and empirical says you will gain speed. The goal of base building is to increase aerobic speed (the speed you can go at heart rate). Building aerobic speed is relatively easy with heart rate training. After 3-4 weeks of base building you will find that you are able to run faster at the same heart rate. Throughout the rest of base building, you will continue to improve.

What Were My Personal Heart Rate Training Results?

Now, let me share my personal experience with training in this manner. When I first began, I had been training 4 months consecutively without injuries. I was doing a lot of speed work and going anaerobic in nearly every workout. My body constantly felt like it was recovering. Initially, I could run a 7:50 pace at a heart rate of 148. While training at heart rate, I felt MUCH better. My body nearly always felt fresh, long runs didn’t kill me, back to back runs were now possible, and I got sick less often. After 3 months I was able to run a 7:25 pace at a heart rate of 148. Then I hit race season (without having done any speed work at all). Here are the results in the run:

  • Race 1 (sprint tri) - 6:14 pace (compared to 6:55 the prior year)
  • Race 2 (sprint tri)- 6:13 pace after averaging 25.0 mph on bike (didn’t do this race the prior year)
  • Race 3 (olympic tri) – 6:37 pace after averaging 24.1 mph on bike (compared to 6:53 the prior year)
  • Race 4 (olympic plus tri) – 6:23 pace after a bike route that had 1500 ft of climbing (7:03 prior year)

I would look at my watch after each race and wonder where these times were coming from because I was now standing on the podium.

Regarding my improvements, they fall exactly in line with what the research says you can expect. After your base building period, I usually recommend adding speed work 1-2 days per week. In my case in the year referenced above, I didn’t get to add speed work because I began my base building so late. I used my races as my speed work.

Heart rate training is effective, reduces injuries, and reduces general stress on the body. It remains one of the most effective means of training for endurance athletes.

heath-spudman

Aero Helmets: Are They Worth It or Not?

0

First Off, What Exactly Is an Aero Helmet?

We’ll let the picture do the talking.

Is it worth putting on one of those hot, goofy looking helmets or not? This is a question I have asked myself again and again.

I have been very resistant to aero helmets because of my doubts about them to date. In fact, my wife and training partners have been reminding me that I have said several times that I will never use an aero helmet, but I also said years ago that I would never wear tight bike shorts. Now I am perfectly fine walking around in triathlon shorts and no shirt, and I even stopped in the grocery store the other day in bike shorts.  So, being my tolerance for goofy-looking apparel and gear is greater, I finally decided to look more deeply at the science behind the effectiveness of aero helmets. Here is what I’ve found…

Wind Tunnel Testing of Aero Helmets

In a wind tunnel setting, aero helmets definitely appear to be a lot of bang for the buck (compared to other things). They are definitely a better deal than the outragously expensive wheelsets we are all riding on nowadays. Some of these studies make aero helmets out to be incredibly effective, however when you look at comparisons to other products and clothing (such as bike gloves and water bottle placement), you will start to wonder if it is really worth the criticism when your dad sees a picture of you in this helmet.

Unfortunately, wind tunnels are our only meaningful methods of gaining evidence for the effectiveness of helmets, bike designs, wheels, etc. due to real life conditions having too many variables at any given time. Although wind tunnels are generally accepted as accurate, they are not the real world. For example, a specific wheelset may provide much greater benefit than your stock wheelset in a 12 degree headwind, however it may have no advantage at all in a straight headwind with 70% humidity and the temperature at 93 degrees. Conditions in the real world are never completely predictable. There is not adequate real-world evidence to help make a clear decision about whether an aero helmet is beneficial or not. Anecdotally, there are many people out there claiming they help, BUT of course they are going to say they help if they dropped $150-350 on a funny looking helmet.

I have read blogs about people experimenting with their new aero helmets. Some have tried to be as objective as possible by riding the same course in similar conditions. Most of these people find benefit. BUT, centuries of experiments have clearly concluded that when you put an expectation or hope into the mind of the “scientist” (aka athlete in this case) and the “scientist” is in control of the experiment, you will almost always get a placebo affect. In the cases of these amateur experiments, there is undoubtedly going to be some degree of placebo effect.

The conclusion I have come to is that certain people will find benefit, while others will not.

Will You Find Benefit in Wearing an Aero Helmet?

A huge factor in determining if an aero helmet will decrease your time is your abilities, riding position, technique, and race distance. Wind tunnel studies are very clear in showing that those with an optimal aero bike fit and good position (riding technique) will find benefit in using an aero helmet. Studies also show this benefit doesn’t become apparent unless you are averaging over 22mph. The benefits at 22mph aren’t big, however the benefits grow exponentially as your average rises above 22mph. So, if you are a strong rider that averages greater than 22mph, ride in an aggressive time trial position and have a superb, custom bike fit done by an aero trained specialist (see my blog about bike fits), and are doing a longer race such as a 70.3 or 140.6 triathlon, you will likely find benefit. If you don’t fit this mold, save your pride.

Fezzari Bicycles Carries a number of bike helmets, including the Giro Atmos and the Giro Ionos road helmets. If you are interested in an aero helmet, please call us direct at 1-888-8FEZZARI.

You Might Also Be Interested in Reading:
Bike Saddle Position: Does One Degree Make a Difference? 

Go to Top